Why did grubby leaves eg

I bet Grubby had way more practice experience then you thought. It's only been made public that he recently has begun to play sc2 competetiveley. Ofc also wc3 players get boring of this game at a point in time and want to try out the new blizz games. For that reason I bet he had the game for quite a long time before the tournaments.

Still he was a very good wc3 player back then I remember he was probably the best when he was on the 4 Kings team. Grubby was one of the greatest wc3 players ive ever seen. But his SC2 yesterday Assembly was just terribad Really guys stop hyping him, he made worse decisions then people 3 days into the beta.

Hope his teammates at EG help him learn how to macro since he's surrounded by gosucoaching coaches besides them being just great players ofc. Can't wait to follow him in the future if he devotes him self to sc2. What I saw in his games were remarkable decisions at times, even if many people disagree and only saw the flaws in his game, yes I saw them too, but I wanna point out a few things that made a lot of sense, and trying to understand the mistakes [Note: This is pure speculation and personal view on what it looked like for me] In game 1, the decision going Carriers instead of trying to stomp the front was good, he just saw PF'ses and marauders camping, and there was no good angle to attack.

He was making good moves with the HT's storming the frontlines and the back. Did u guys miss how he was saccing his probes, but then pulled his probes back to include a HT to feedback FOUR medivacs? He was testing the front on both sides, trying to get good storms off on the vikings, trying to break the expo of Sarens. Overall, very good game by both of them.

And I was no fan on expanding again to the top. I can't remember much about that game, but he made to many immortals? For once the marine block, that is not as easy as it looks like. Smart, but ineffective when the hellions are already there as you could see I'm more a fan of the box 3, click, box 3, click method The attack in the back was smart, planned out for sure, but smart.

When Sarens kinda went allin with his counter attack, Grubby lost a few units, when he could kill at least 1 tank there, and lost the same amount of units. When he let his expo die there, there was no excuse for it as well, big blunder. But on the counter attack with the zealots and stalkers, Loved it!

But then, then final attack by grubby, I did not see if he saw where the tanks were, or what went on in his mind, but for me it looked like he TRIED to avoid the tanks with the collosi, big mistake in my eyes, he could snipe the tanks from A His expo edge or B just left of his ramp on the high ground both with nothing hitting them, apart from few viking hits after 1 or 2 tanks would have been sniped, but then stalkers could have hit them But he did the worst possible angle, but I liked the part he TRIED to make a good angle.

This is from my perspective, and just from seeing it once, but overall I saw good things and hope he learns from this, and hope to see more from him in the future. On February 12 LuckyFool wrote: I don't really understand everyones concern about grubby being impressive at sc2 right away It's almost as if this thread is trying to justifying his skill or something which I find odd.

He was unarguably the best war3 player in history? Sorry didn't follow war3 closely but I know he won 3 wcg grand finals? Give it time, I'm sure if he dedicates himself he can be a top sc2 player.

I know he played in a TL Open a few weeks ago and lost in the first round to theognis Also everyone keep in mind.. Nada and Boxer People were expecting Nada to clean up everyone because of his talent, but that clearly didnt happen. Boxer got to a Ro4? SC2 is a young mans game.. On February 12 Skyze wrote: Also everyone keep in mind.. I am really impressive about his unit mixes,controls and some really good creative ideas.

But for sure he is not even a really good Master leagues player because his lack of macro is quite huge at the moment. If he is able to clear the problem like some other top players Demuslim,Hasuobs - i was rlly impressed about his PvT on Shakuras vs Sarens I really looking forward to his play in some months. It seemed like grubby lacked a strong game sense of when his army was stronger than his opponent's how big his opponent's army was at a given point and a few other things I think he slipped on his macro a few times, there's the whole multiple probes building at once thing.

I didn't see any problems that can't be fixed by a bit more practice though, which is encouraging. He essentially has the hard parts down, he just needs to get more comfortable in the game. I was really impressed by how well Grubby played considering how little time he's spent with the game, and he should definitely be proud of how he played.

I don't doubt he'll be crazy good once he starts practicing full time. Grubby fighting! Clem vs goblin. MaxPax vs Clem. SpeCial vs herO. Bly vs Spirit. PiGStarcraft Liquipedia Discussion. Yes, 5 players or so abusing a hero with very complex mechanics caused the entire playerbase of Did they have to do it to win? They won in the end and people complained, so what? Right now, I see a lot of fun stuff happening on ladder, I see people consistently playing other heroes on Orc outside of just BM every single game, I see humans playing at least 2 heroes AM and MK.

Play 6. XX versions than in 7. I honestly have no trust in pro players in not putting their bias in too, most of them will want the race that they cannot use nerfed.

I think 1. Remember that before it was just boring DM vs BM matches. Whoa community decides… like the one here that has no clue of 1 on? And only plays custom games and the most casual modes 3v3 4v4? Cool story. I think they used some HUman feedback recently. The balance should be decided by the developers, pro players AND the community, to build a consense.

The mindset of a proplayer rather accept the game how it is, they rather search the mistakes in there play and strategys, other than the game. But of course, they also have there opinions, If they are biased towards a race or not.

There opinons are usualy more competent than the normal battlenet players are, but that does definitely not mean, the ladder players should be ignored.

If more and more bnet players keep complaining about the same thing, blademaster windwalk for now or tanks for example, it should become a thing to look at. This procedure describes how to change kernel command-line parameters for all boot entries on your system.

This procedure describes how to change kernel command-line parameters for a single boot entry on your system. On systems that use the grub. The following procedure allows you to make temporary changes to a Kernel Menu Entry by changing the kernel parameters only during a single boot process. On some systems, Home and End keys might also work. Edit the kernel parameters as required. For example, to run the system in emergency mode, add the emergency parameter at the end of the linux16 line:.

To enable the system messages, remove the rhgb and quiet parameters. Press Esc key to leave command line editing and it will drop all the user made changes. Chapter 5. Configuring kernel command-line parameters. Understanding kernel command-line parameters.